• 《戴维·佩珀生态学马克思主义理论研究》
  • 作者:王玉沿著
  • 单位:中央民族大学
  • 论文名称 戴维·佩珀生态学马克思主义理论研究
    作者 王玉沿著
    学科 马克思主义哲学
    学位授予单位 中央民族大学
    导师 宫玉宽指导
    出版年份 2019
    中文摘要 人与自然的关系是人所面临的基本关系之一。按照马克思主义的观点,人与人之间关系的基础在于人与自然的关系,因为整个社会运动的根本动力在于社会生产方式的内在矛盾,生产力的发展是推动社会的最终动力,而生产力是标志着人与自然关系的范畴。肇始于18世纪40年代的工业革命推动人类物质财富巨大增长的同时,带来了诸多环境问题。随着世界工业化的不断推进,这些问题日渐尖锐化,诸如资源、能源匮乏、污染严重、生态环境失衡等问题已经严重地威胁人类的生存和可持续发展,生态问题已经成为全球性和时代性的问题。 “任何真正的哲学都是自己时代精神的精华”,“是文明的活的灵魂”。面对时代的问题,需要思考出现问题的原因,需要从根本上对人与自然之间的关系进行审视和批判,需要用马克思主义哲学的理论指导人与自然关系问题的解决。随着整个历史和社会具体条件的变迁,马克思主义哲学也需要发展,需要为新的时代问题提供解决方案。 产生于20世纪70年代的生态学马克思主义,将马克思主义理论通过不同的方式与生态问题的研究结合起来,希望通过马克思主义理论分析和解决生态问题,其路径是批评当代资本主义制度,目的在于保护人类生存的家园——自然,并构建一种新型的生态理论范式,建立一个新型的生态社会主义社会。 戴维·佩珀(David Pepper)(1940—)是英国牛津布鲁克斯大学地理系教授,是生态学马克思主义第三阶段的代表人物,其主要理论创新在于深入讨论了生态社会主义和生态中心主义的区别,对两者的原则进行了细致的区分,辨析了“红色绿党”和“绿色绿党”的政治主张。戴维·佩珀批判了“绿色分子”对于马克思主义的误解(马克思主义是机械决定论),忽视人性维度和精神维度。他坚持用马克思主义理论改造绿色运动,坚持实践观、客观辩证法(事物和现象的特征在于它们的运动和冲突)、唯物史观、资本主义论和社会主义论等,认为马克思主义理论才是解决生态危机的正确出路,只有马克思主义才能真正解决环境问题,从而主张“绿色红化”,具体提出了生态社会主义的构想,将生态社会主义的社会蓝图清晰地展现出来。 戴维·佩珀生态学马克思主义思想在学术界和理论界产生了较大影响,具有重要地位。研究戴维·佩珀的生态学马克思主义思想,对当前我国生态文明建设具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。 本文在总体结构上分为绪论部分、佩珀思想的社会历史背景和理论来源、佩珀的主要思想、对佩珀思想的评析、佩珀思想与中国特色社会主义社会生态文明建设之间的关系。 绪论部分介绍本文的选题意义、研究现状和述评、研究思路、研究方法、论文的创新点。 第一章是戴维·佩珀生态学马克思主义思想产生的社会背景和理论来源。本章首先简单介绍了资本主义社会生态危机的爆发和针对生态危机兴起的绿色运动,正是生态危机的爆发和人们对于生态危机意识的不断增强而采取的一系列运动,使得整个时代精神有了绿色的印记。戴维·佩珀主要在吸收马克思恩格斯有关的生态理论并扬弃其他生态学马克思主义者的思想基础上,逐步创立了自己解决生态危机的理论。 第二章是戴维·佩珀关于资本主义生态危机的思想。本章首先介绍佩珀对绿色运动中关于生态危机主流理论的批判,在此基础上,佩珀从多个维度分析了资本主义生态危机的本质,最后得出资本主义生态危机的根源是资本主义生产方式。 第三章是戴维·佩珀关于生态社会主义社会的构建思想。他认为生态社会主义社会的价值取向是新人类中心主义,而实现的途径是“红、绿联盟”,并最终勾画出生态社会主义社会的具体图景。 第四章主要是笔者对于戴维·佩珀生态学马克思主义理论的评析,包括其理论的进步意义和局限性。进步意义包括对于马克思主义理论的推进贡献和解决生态问题的创新思考等;局限性主要在于佩珀作为一个西方学者深受西方文化传统影响,未能全面认识马克思主义,对资本主义社会制度表现出一定的妥协性,其理论体现出折衷主义倾向。 第五章是笔者在整体结构和一般内容上建构戴维·佩珀生态理论和我国社会主义生态文明之间的关系,发掘其理论对于我国生态文明建设的意义,实现在解决生态危机上的哲学创新。 结语部分是对整个文章内容的概述。 关键词:生态危机;绿色运动;马克思主义生态理论;生态文明建设
    英文摘要 The relationship between man and nature is one of the basic relationships that people face. According to Marxism, the relationship between man and man is based on the relationship between man and nature, because the fundamental driving force of the whole social movement lies in the inherent contradiction of social production mode. The development of productivity is the ultimate driving force for society, and productivity is the category that marks the relationship between man and nature. The industrial revolution that began in the 1840s led to tremendous growth in human material wealth and brought many environmental problems. With the continuous advancement of the world's industrialization, these problems have become increasingly acute. Problems such as lack of resources, energy shortage, serious pollution, and imbalance of ecological environment have seriously threatened the survival and sustainable development of human beings. Ecological problems have become global and contemporary. "Any true philosophy is the essence of the spirit of your own time" and "is the living soul of civilization." In the face of the problems of the times, we need to think about the premise and reasons for the problems. We need to fundamentally examine and criticize the relationship between man and nature. We need to use the theory of Marxist philosophy to guide the solution of the relationship between man and nature. With the changes in the history and social specific conditions, Marxist philosophy also needs to develop, and it needs to provide solutions for the new era. The Ecological Marxism that emerged in the 1970s combines Marxist theory with ecological issues in different ways, hoping to analyze and solve ecological problems through Marxist theory, whose path is to criticize the contemporary capitalist system with the aim of protecting humanity survival homeland - nature, and to build a new ecological theory paradigm to establish a new type of Ecological Socialist society. David Pepper (1940--) is a professor at the Department of Geography at Oxford Brookes University in the UK. He is a representative of the third stage of Ecological Marxism. His main theoretical innovation lies in the in-depth discussion of Ecological Socialism and Ecocentrism. The difference between the two principles is a careful distinction between the "Red Green Party" and the "Green Green Party" political proposition. David Pepper criticized the misunderstanding of "Green Molecules" for Marxism - Marxism is mechanical determinism, ignoring humanism and spiritual dimensions. He insisted on transforming the green movement with Marxist theory, believing in the concept of Practice, Objective Dialectics (the characteristics of things and phenomena lie in their movements and conflicts), Historical Materialism, Capitalism and Socialism, and argued that Marxist theory was the solution, and the correct way of resolving the ecological crisis. And it is considered by Pepper that only Marxism can truly solve environmental problems, thus, he advocated "green red", and specifically put forward the concept of Ecological Socialism, and clearly showed the social blueprint of Ecological Socialism. David Pepper's Ecological Marxism thought has had a great influence in the academic and theoretical circles and also has an important position. Studying David Pepper's ecological Marxist thought has important theoretical value for the current construction of China's ecological civilization and has a strong practical significance. This paper is divided into the introduction part, the social historical background and theoretical source of David Pepper's thought, David Pepper's main thought, the analysis of David Pepper's thought, the relationship between David Pepper's thought and the construction of social civilization with Chinese characteristics, and finally the analysis part of the entire article. The introduction introduces the significance, research status and review, research ideas, research methods, innovations and difficulties of this paper. The first chapter is the social background and theoretical source of David Pepper's Ecological Marxism thought. This chapter first briefly introduces the outbreak of capital social ecological crisis and the emerging green movement aiming at solving the ecological crisis. There is no doubt that it is the outbreak of ecological crisis and people's increasing awareness of ecological crisis with a series of actions that have given the spirit of the times a green mark. David Pepper not only absorbed the related ecological theories of Marx and Engels’, but also sublated the thoughts of some other Ecological Marxists, and then he gradually created his own theory of solving ecological crises. The second chapter is David Pepper's thought about the ecological crisis of capitalism. This chapter first introduces Pepper's critique of the two mainstream theories of analyzing ecological crisis in the green movement. On this basis, Pepper analyzes the essence of the capitalist ecological crisis from multiple dimensions, and finally summarizes the root causes of the capitalist ecological crisis- Capitalist Production Mode. The third chapter is David Pepper's thought on the construction of Ecological Socialism. It is deemed that the value orientation of Ecological Socialism is the new anthropocentrism, whose realization approach is the alliance of “red” and “green”, and finally he put forward the conception of Ecological Socialist society. The fourth chapter is mainly the author's evaluation of David Pepper's Ecological Marxism theory, including the progressive significance and limitations of his theory. The progressive significance of his theory includes the massive boost for Marxist theory and innovative thoughts on solving ecological problems. And limitations are reflected on that Pepper fails to fully understand Marxism as a Western scholar, who is deeply influenced by the Western cultural traditions, and shows a certain compromise to the capitalist ruling relationship with eclecticism in his theory. The fifth chapter is about the author’s construction of the relationship between David Pepper's ecological theory and the construction of China's socialist ecological civilization in the overall structure and general content, and explores the significance of his theory to the ecological civilization construction in China, and its philosophical innovation of solving the ecological crisis. The conclusion is the author's summary of the content of the whole article. Keywords: Ecological Crisis; Green Movement; Marxist Ecological Theory; Construction of Ecological Civilization
    鸥维数据云查询平台
      联系我们
    • 电话:400-139-8015
    • 微信:vbeiyou
    • 邮箱:ovo@qudong.com
    • 总部:北京市海淀区学院路30号科群大厦西楼5层
    Copyright © 西北大学西部大数据研究院旗下“鸥维数据” 京ICP备17065155号-6